5/1/2023 0 Comments Manyland ep 1![]() During our journey, we went scuba diving, transformed into a mermaid, took a Star Wars space ship to fly, rode a dragon, chilled out in a Starbucks world, danced with bears, become a fox, and a lot more that was enough to get us hooked. The game is really simple yet even without signing up, we spent around 8 hours just exploring what other people made, while there were some less-finished places after we went far and wide, there are some extremely interesting creations and worlds. For a 2D world, the amount of freedom a player has and the ease of use of the drawing mechanics truly sets the game apart from its counterparts. People can create their own objects and can even create their own worlds. It has no unified story, rules, or any other predefined structures. The game consists of 2D worlds that are entirely created by the players. Manyland is a Sandbox Styled 2d MMO(Massive Multiplayer Online) game where players have their own avatars named Manyzens. After trying a couple of games, we weren’t sure if there was a game that would fit our expectations until we came across Manyland. So, we looked for a game that induced creativity, was simple to play, and wasn’t too popular. Anyway, we decided to use this spare time to find some games that are both fun and have design value. Lamone et al., 1:19-cv-02228.As like must of our readers, we have been stuck home in quarantine for the past weeks. The case is The National Federation of the Blind Inc. Fetter of Brown, Goldstein & Levy LLP in Baltimore. The plaintiffs are represented by Jessica P. “Because of the Board’s consistent failure to adopt these or similar policies designed to create an integrated voting experience for voters with and without disabilities, the voting experiences of blind Maryland voters have deteriorated with the move to paper-based voting,” the complaint states. The three individual plaintiffs reported having issues voting every year since 2016, citing issues from inoperable BMDs at their polling places to unhelpful workers. The board since has raised the minimum number of voters required to use BMDs to five per precinct, but the plaintiffs express “little confidence” that this change will happen in 2020, based on the board’s history. The Maryland affiliate of the NFB repeatedly asked the board, and later the legislature, to revisit election policies and procedures, cautioning that blind voters’ ballots would not be secret without changes, according to the complaint. The board required that a minimum of two voters use the BMDs at each precinct, but evidence showed this did not happen everywhere. In 2007, legislation was enacted that required the board, beginning in 2010, to certify voting machines that would leave a paper trail and required voters with disabilities to have access to a BMD.Ī 2013 opinion by the Maryland Office of the Attorney General warned that the board would violate the accessibility provision of the law unless it used one accessible system for all voters or required a portion of voters without disabilities to use BMDs, according to the complaint. “Maryland’s use of dual voting systems, therefore, renders the lesser used system an inferior voting option for those who must use the BMD to vote independently.”Īccording to the complaint, between 20 all voters used the same electronic voting machines, which were equipped with accessibility features that allowed blind voters to use them. “In addition, because the BMDs are a secondary, poorly used voting option, poll workers are not as familiar with how to operate them, sometimes even failing to plug them in before a voter requests to use one,” the complaint alleges. Though at least two voters per precinct are supposed to use the BMD ballots, some polling places have had only one person use it, making their ballot distinct and destroying the secrecy of their vote. The “ballot marking device” (BMD) ballots “differ in shape, size, and content from the hand-marked ballots” and are “readily distinguishable” from them, according to the complaint. Since 2016, the plaintiffs allege that the board has made hand-marking paper ballots “the default voting option in Maryland” but that voters with disabilities who cannot mark by hand are offered a voting machine that electronically marks and prints paper ballots. The plaintiffs also include the local NFB affiliate and three registered Maryland voters who are blind. District Court in in Baltimore on Thursday, claims violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and seeks a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. The National Federation of the Blind is suing the Maryland State Board of Elections over policy changes that allegedly have resulted in “two separate and unequal voting systems” for voters with disabilities and everyone else.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |